This source has the nicest looking pictures. Let's start with them. (Click on each of the three images below for a "medium resolution" (2048 pixel wide) version.) These images were drawn in 1902 for Scientific American by C. McKnight-Smith (look carefully at the lower left corner of the typesetter image). I presume that he used the Church patent illustrations as his source. They are therefore interpretations, done 80 years after the fact. They are not primary source material. Still, they're very nice.
To understand the technical details of the machines, I find it useful to print out copies of the medium-resolution (2048 pixel wide) versions of the illustrations to follow along (or open a second copy of this page in another window, if your screen is big enough). Even in the original printed edition something like this (if it had been possible) would have been useful, as the description of the typecaster is mostly on p. 109 (but the illustration is on p. 116), while the description of the typesetter is on p. 116 (but the illustration is on p. 109).
The remainder of the reproduction here will be visually unsatisfactory, The magazine is larger than my scanner and I had to scan it in sections, so anything presented here will be a composite. The "stitching together" is imperfect. This is important source material, so I wanted to work from 1,200 dpi scans (the best my scanner can do). But putting together a full newspaper page at this resolution involves holding something on the order of 5 Gigabytes of image data in memory. This wasn't a viable option for me, since my computer presently has "only" two gigabytes of memory. I therefore produced the composite versions below by scaling the 1200dpi images by 50 percent, resulting in what are effectively 600dpi images. These are ok, but hardly archival.
More importantly, however, the largest and fanciest screen in the world today is a smaller and lower-resolution output device than the humblest sheet of newsprint from the 19th century. So there's no good way to see it all at once, anyway, in anything approaching the original. For that you need letterpress printing and big sheets of paper.
I'll try it in three ways: (1) as two images (one for p. 109 and one for p. 116), (2) as PDF versions of the same two images, and (3) as multiple images which won't give proper page relationships but which will be readable onscreen.
Here it is as two single-page images. The version visible directly on this page has been reduced to 1024 pixels in width and converted (lossily) to JPEG. Click on it to get to a 600dpi version, presented as a lossless PNG but still reduced from the 1200dpi original scans. Note that both images are composite versions and therefore, quite aside from their lack of archival resolution, should not be considered reference images.
Here are full-resolution 1200dpi scans of these image, as lossless PNG files. The image of the press was rotated 90 degrees clockwise, and that of the typecaster 180 degrees, but these images are otherwise unprocessed.
The 1903 issue of Scientific American from which this material is taken is in the public domain. The PDF and PNG versions of it here are similarly in the public domain; I assert no additional rights on these versions.
This present Notebook is an investigation into and reprint of work that is in the public domain. It is not connected in any way with, nor is it endorsed by, the present owners of Scientific American. "Scientific American" is, I'm sure, also their trademark; it is used here only to identify this material and in material in the public domain.
All portions of this document not noted otherwise are Copyright © 2009 by David M. MacMillan and Rollande Krandall.
Circuitous Root is a Registered Trademark of David M. MacMillan and Rollande Krandall.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons "Attribution - ShareAlike" license. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ for its terms.
Presented originally by Circuitous Root®
Select Resolution: 0 [other resolutions temporarily disabled due to lack of disk space]